This entry was posted on Wednesday, February 14th, 2007 at 3:49 pm and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2 Responses to “Video of George Galloway in the UK Parliament, January 2007”
This guy hasn’t got a CLUE about Lebanon. Dear Galloway the retard: there is something in Lebanon called Ta’ef which is their constitution. They put it together in order to build their democracy, one that is special in that it divides power equally between Muslims and Christians. As for Nasrallah being President…you can keep on dreaming, Nasrallah would NOT get the most votes, he would get the shia vote and that’s it.
I find that 99% of the time Galloway says nothing that is beneficial and of value. Sure he’s anti-war, pro-democracy (not George W style democracy), & yadda yadda yadda.. But he never goes beyond the “ranting” phase. Ever watch his debate against Christopher Hitchens? Most of the time he’s dodging the issues being debated at hand and focuses more on personal attacks against his opponent. His speeches and debates are good only for entertainment value and that’s it!
February 14, 2007 at 10:16 pm
This guy hasn’t got a CLUE about Lebanon. Dear Galloway the retard: there is something in Lebanon called Ta’ef which is their constitution. They put it together in order to build their democracy, one that is special in that it divides power equally between Muslims and Christians. As for Nasrallah being President…you can keep on dreaming, Nasrallah would NOT get the most votes, he would get the shia vote and that’s it.
February 17, 2007 at 12:53 am
I find that 99% of the time Galloway says nothing that is beneficial and of value. Sure he’s anti-war, pro-democracy (not George W style democracy), & yadda yadda yadda.. But he never goes beyond the “ranting” phase. Ever watch his debate against Christopher Hitchens? Most of the time he’s dodging the issues being debated at hand and focuses more on personal attacks against his opponent. His speeches and debates are good only for entertainment value and that’s it!